Sunwell Lewtz!

Mike · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: Sunwell Lewtz!

_________________

Parsifal · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:18 pm Post subject:

What is this "expertise"?
_________________
<(@_@<), <(@_@)>, (>@_@)>, <(@_@)>, <(@_~)>, <(@_@)>, <(@_@<)

Mike · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:19 pm Post subject:

The new thing for +weapon skill.

It makes it so the enemy has less of a chance to parry/dodge/block your shit.

So if you max your hit rating and expertise... you cant' miss.. at all.

Good for tanks. Expertise is NEEDED for warrior tanks.
_________________

Karazorel · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject:

Works like hit rating. Blizzard can't make up their mind and focus on one system. Some of these weapons are just becoming ridiculous. I'm a hunter with fort at 10k health in full epics, was wearing a few PVP arena pieces, and I got two shot... yes 2 shot by a Mortal strike warrior wearing Welfare S1 epics, a couple of S2, S3, and an S3 axe. 2 shot... I wear Mail for christ sakes.
_________________

It's not easy being me but I make it look damn good.

Mike · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:29 pm Post subject:

Warriors always have and always will spank hunters. Pre-BC I could take down T2 hunters on my alt warr who never saw so much as ZG. Them's just the breaks. Play a priest, we can't do shit.

Anyways, expertise and hit are similar but different. Hit is so that your attacks don't miss. You pump it up to offset the possible miss %, so ya hit more.

Expertise makes you avoid the enemies defenses. With max hit but no expertise, you can hit every hit, but get avoided each time. Max both = everything hits and nothing is avoided.
_________________

Karazorel · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:35 pm Post subject:

No. There's a difference between beat and 2 shot. No class should kill another class in 2 hits if they're even level. And pre bc I could demolish warriors. Nothing easier than kiting a warrior with traps and wing clips. Now days it's impossible.
_________________

It's not easy being me but I make it look damn good.

Mike · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:22 pm Post subject:

I still never had an issue with hunters, but no matter.

Again I say... try being a priest. Razz

_________________

Karazorel · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:33 pm Post subject:

I iz a priest. U r seeing my Armoriez luking at my epix.
_________________

It's not easy being me but I make it look damn good.

Mike · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:41 pm Post subject:

You iz teh alt preest. I hupe you PvP srs buzns... preest gets wtfpwned by hax MS bullshitz, aynd eveerything else. Huntards QQ about warr. pwning but can facepalm evrythng elz.
_________________

Dave · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVG9Kz3HTQE
_________________
"Addiction can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only be changed."
-Clango, Diesel Sweeties
===
I (heart) Hanners of Questionable Content.

Karazorel · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:51 pm Post subject:

No way. Only thing that I can consistantly beat as a hunter is a Holy priest or a fire mage. Everything else even gear with me and sometimes (rogue, warrior, druid, warlock) less gear than me can completely destroy me. And I pvp on my priest all the time. Look at her armory right now. She's in her PVP set.
_________________

It's not easy being me but I make it look damn good.

Dave · Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:57 pm Post subject:

That was a parody of a "World of Roguecraft" video. I'd post the link, but it's a VERY long video, and the bit about "Warlocks are Mushrooms!" is hilarious... so it may just be worth finding it and looking at it once.

But yeah, back when I was PvPing, it did seem like Warriors are Rocks, Rogues are Scissors, and Everyone Else was paper, except when an MS Warrior "Rock" hit 60, had half-way-decent gear, and then became an unstoppable force of nature renamed "The Rock" that could not find Scissors, so instead they pounded on poor Papers.

And Warlocks are mushrooms.
_________________
"Addiction can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only be changed."
-Clango, Diesel Sweeties
===
I (heart) Hanners of Questionable Content.